Subjects for FTC PrivacyCon 2022 embody industrial surveillance, automated decision-making
The FTC’s seventh annual PrivacyCon is scheduled for November 1, 2022. It’s not the upcoming Bonnaroo competition, and it gained’t be headlining Stevie Nicks, J. Cole, Herbie Hancock, and Robert Plant. However then once more, how a lot are you able to be taught in regards to the newest privacy- and security-related developments and analysis from “Landslide”? Observe the Enterprise Weblog for updates in regards to the agenda for the November 1st digital occasion. And take into account one other essential date that’s simply seven weeks away.
As a part of PrivacyCon 2022, the FTC has issued a Name for Shows, searching for related empirical analysis and demonstrations, together with rigorous financial analyses. The deadline for submissions is July 29, 2022. Learn the Name for Shows for particulars in regards to the choice standards and evaluation course of. Listed below are a number of the topics the FTC has a selected curiosity in:
- Algorithmic bias and making certain equity in using algorithms;
- Industrial surveillance, together with office monitoring, surveillance promoting, and biometric surveillance;
- Potential new cures and approaches to enhance privateness and safety practices – for instance, the deletion of algorithms or different merchandise developed utilizing knowledge illegally collected from shoppers; and
- Kids’s and teenage’s privateness dangers, harms, and vulnerabilities, significantly these introduced by rising applied sciences.
Moderated by FTC workers, PrivacyCon 2022 guarantees to deliver collectively panels of researchers, teachers, trade representatives, client advocates, and legislation enforcers to debate the newest analysis. The occasion is open to the general public and will probably be webcast from a hyperlink that may go reside on the morning of November 1st.
On second thought, “The landslide introduced me down” is a reasonably good description of the damage to shoppers that firms inflict via questionable privateness and knowledge safety practices. So perhaps we’ve underestimated Ms. Nicks’ insights into the topic.
