Elon Musk asks if he ought to stop Twitter and bitcoiners put ahead their candidates | by Paul Phoenix | Coinmonks | Dec, 2022
Elon Musk asks if he ought to stop Twitter and bitcoiners put ahead their candidates.
Elon misplaced a ballot to search out out if the neighborhood needs him to stay CEO of Twitter, whereas bitcoiners consider candidates.
Greater than 17 million folks participated in a ballot by which Elon Musk asks customers’ opinions on whether or not he ought to step down as Twitter chief and practically 60%, together with many bitcoiners, reply, “sure, go away.”
Musk had mentioned earlier than publishing the ballot “I’ll abide by the outcomes”, so, in a attainable state of affairs Elon will stay the CEO of Twitter for an extra time, no less than till he will get a substitute.
The billionaire who at the moment owns the micro-messaging community after changing into its majority shareholder final April has not commented for the reason that ballot closed. Nonetheless, some bitcoiners are already proposing candidates to switch him.
Some are placing ahead Edward Snowden, he was the one who revealed to the world, in 2013, the truth concerning the “assortment” of information by the Nationwide Safety Company of america.
Others desire Twitter to be again within the arms of Jack Dorsey, however finally many within the Bitcoin neighborhood are calling for the election of a CEO who understands the cryptocurrency ecosystem.
For the previous decade Twitter has been utilized by bitcoiners as their most well-liked social community to share or debate concepts and, in lots of circumstances, report essential tales.
In truth, some ideas shared by builders and members of the ecosystem, are thought-about of excessive historic worth.
The Twitter account of the late Hal Finney is one which the neighborhood considers beneficial. This account was “resurrected” after mendacity dormant for greater than a decade.
Hal’s spouse, Fran Finney, doesn’t need the concepts shared by the primary man to function a Bitcoin community node to vanish ceaselessly, having acquired the software program straight from Satoshi Nakamoto.
In any case, when Musk acquired Twitter, he mentioned he needed to “ attempt to assist humanity” and that “civilization would have a digital sq.”, however his plans are usually not going nicely, as solely 42.5% are in opposition to his resignation.
There have been numerous controversial modifications at Twitter since Musk purchased the social networking website. First he fired about half of his workers after which was criticized for his method to how content material ought to be moderated on the micro-messaging community.
Lately, advocates for human rights teams have singled him out for what they name “dictatorial habits.”
Amongst different actions, they criticize him for having closed the Twitter accounts of some journalists who cowl social media-related information, in addition to that of a number of customers who’ve shared information from Mastodon, a decentralized social community that rivals Twitter.
On this regard, the UN tweeted that freedom of the press “will not be a toy”, whereas the European Union threatened Twitter with sanctions.
It’s value to say that each entities (UN & European Union) had been OK when shutting down 1000’s of Twitter accounts of people that objected covid mandates and anybody who mentioned something on-line in opposition to the narrative.
In the meantime, Jack Dorsey, former CEO of Twitter, donated 14 bitcoins to the decentralized social community Nostr.
The challenge is seen by developer William Casarin as a communications layer that matches the Bitcoin economic system and as an initiative that contributes to the evolution of the Web.
Nostr itself is a protocol, developed by Fiat Jaf, which doesn’t depend on a central trusted server.
As a substitute, all customers run a shopper and with it publish content material that they signal with their personal key after which ship it to different servers that transmit that content material. Its primary operate is to just accept posts and ship them to relay contributors.